Sign in Subscribe

difference between sa and nsa in 5g

Last updated on 

In the context of 5G (fifth-generation) mobile networks, SA (Standalone) and NSA (Non-Standalone) refer to different architectures for deploying 5G. These architectures have implications for how quickly and in what manner 5G services can be rolled out, what capabilities are initially available, and how the network evolves over time. Let's delve into the technical details:

1. NSA (Non-Standalone):

a. Architecture:

  • In NSA deployment, 5G is built upon an existing 4G LTE network infrastructure. This means that the 5G radio access network (RAN) connects to a 4G core network (also known as EPC, Evolved Packet Core).

b. Phased Approach:

  • NSA allows operators to introduce 5G more quickly and at a lower cost because they can leverage existing 4G infrastructure.
  • Initially, only the user plane (i.e., the data path) benefits from 5G speeds and capabilities. Control plane signaling still goes through the 4G infrastructure.

c. Limitations:

  • Because it's dependent on the 4G core network, NSA may not fully exploit all the features and capabilities that 5G promises, such as ultra-low latency or advanced network slicing.
  • It doesn't provide the full end-to-end benefits of 5G right away since it relies on the 4G core for control and mobility management.

2. SA (Standalone):

a. Architecture:

  • SA means that 5G operates entirely independently of 4G networks. Both the 5G RAN and the core network are new and built specifically for 5G.

b. Full 5G Benefits:

  • SA enables all the advanced features and capabilities of 5G right from the start. This includes ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC), network slicing, and more.
  • The core network in SA is based on a new architecture called the 5G Core (5GC), which provides more flexibility, scalability, and advanced features compared to the 4G core.

c. Deployment Complexity:

  • Deploying SA requires more investment and time because it involves building a new 5G core network infrastructure alongside the 5G RAN.
  • However, in the long term, SA provides a more future-proof and efficient 5G network architecture.

Conclusion:

  • NSA is a pragmatic approach that allows operators to introduce 5G services faster and at a lower initial cost by leveraging their existing 4G infrastructure. However, it has limitations in terms of delivering the full potential of 5G.
  • SA, on the other hand, offers the complete set of 5G capabilities from the outset but requires more investment and time for deployment.