Sign in Subscribe

difference between lora and wifi

Last updated on 


LoRa (Long Range) and WiFi are both wireless communication technologies, but they serve different purposes and have distinct characteristics. Let's delve into the technical details of each to understand their differences.

1. Frequency Band:

  • LoRa: Operates in the sub-GHz ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) bands, typically around 868 MHz in Europe and 915 MHz in the US. These frequencies allow for longer transmission ranges compared to higher frequencies.
  • WiFi: Operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz ISM bands. The 2.4 GHz band has a longer range but is more congested, while the 5 GHz band offers higher data rates but has a shorter range due to higher frequencies.

2. Range:

  • LoRa: Designed for long-range communication. LoRa devices can transmit over several kilometers in open air, making it suitable for applications like smart agriculture, industrial IoT, and smart cities where devices may be distributed over large areas.
  • WiFi: Primarily designed for short to medium-range communications, typically up to a few hundred meters. It's more suitable for applications within homes, offices, and small businesses.

3. Data Rate:

  • LoRa: Offers low data rates, usually ranging from a few hundred bits per second (bps) to a few kilobits per second (kbps). This low data rate ensures longer battery life for LoRa devices and enhances the range.
  • WiFi: Provides higher data rates, ranging from a few megabits per second (Mbps) to hundreds of Mbps or even more with the latest standards like Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E. This makes WiFi suitable for applications requiring high-speed data transfer such as video streaming, online gaming, and large file downloads.

4. Power Consumption:

  • LoRa: Designed for low power consumption to enable long battery life, especially for devices deployed in remote locations or areas where frequent battery replacement is impractical.
  • WiFi: Typically consumes more power compared to LoRa due to higher data rates and more complex communication protocols. However, advancements in WiFi technology, such as power-saving modes, help in optimizing power consumption for specific applications.

5. Use Cases:

  • LoRa: Ideal for applications that prioritize long-range communication, extended battery life, and low data rates. Common use cases include smart agriculture, environmental monitoring, asset tracking, and remote sensing.
  • WiFi: Suited for applications that require high-speed data transfer within a limited range, such as internet browsing, streaming media, video conferencing, and home automation.

6. Network Architecture:

  • LoRa: Utilizes a star-of-stars topology, where LoRa gateways act as intermediaries between end-devices and a centralized network server. This architecture allows for scalability and flexibility in deploying LoRa networks over large geographical areas.
  • WiFi: Primarily uses a point-to-point or point-to-multipoint topology, where devices connect directly to a WiFi router or access point. In larger deployments, multiple access points may be interconnected to form a mesh network for broader coverage.