Sign in Subscribe

5g ntn frequency

Last updated on 


The difference between 5G NSA (Non-Standalone) and 5G SA (Standalone) lies primarily in how the radio access network and core network are deployed. Let's delve into the technical details of each architecture to understand the distinctions:

1. 5G NSA (Non-Standalone):

1.1 Overview:

  • In 5G NSA, the 5G radio access network (NR) is introduced alongside the existing 4G LTE network. The 5G NR relies on the LTE Evolved Packet Core (EPC) for core network functions.

1.2 Key Components:

  • LTE eNB (Evolved NodeB): Remains a critical component, serving as the master node in dual connectivity scenarios.
  • 5G NR gNB (gNodeB): Introduced to provide additional capacity and higher data rates.
  • EPC (Evolved Packet Core): LTE EPC handles core network functions, and the 5G NR interfaces with it for control and mobility management.

1.3 Interfaces:

  • NG Interface: Connects the 5G NR gNB to the 5G Core Network (5GC).
  • Xn Interface: Connects different 5G NR gNBs within the NG-RAN for inter-gNB communication.
  • E1 Interface: Connects the 5G NR gNB and the LTE eNB for coordination and dual connectivity.

1.4 Dual Connectivity:

  • UEs can connect to both LTE and 5G NR cells simultaneously, leveraging the strengths of both technologies. LTE serves as the anchor for mobility management.

1.5 Deployment Advantages:

  • Allows for an incremental rollout of 5G NR alongside existing LTE infrastructure.
  • Faster time to market as it builds upon existing LTE capabilities.

2. 5G SA (Standalone):

2.1 Overview:

  • In 5G SA, the 5G NR operates independently of existing 4G networks. The 5G Core Network (5GC) is introduced to handle core functions, providing a native 5G experience.

2.2 Key Components:

  • 5G NR gNB (gNodeB): Operates independently without reliance on LTE components.
  • 5GC (5G Core Network): Introduced to handle core network functions, replacing the LTE EPC.

2.3 Interfaces:

  • NG Interface: Connects the 5G NR gNB to the 5GC for end-to-end communication.
  • N1, N2, N3, N4, N6 Interfaces: Connect various functions within the 5GC, handling different aspects of control plane and user plane traffic.

2.4 Network Slicing:

  • Supports network slicing, allowing the creation of virtualized networks with different characteristics to cater to diverse services and applications.

2.5 Deployment Challenges:

  • Requires a full 5G Core Network deployment, which might involve more extensive infrastructure upgrades.
  • Longer time to market compared to 5G NSA due to the need for a complete standalone architecture.

3. Comparison:

3.1 Core Network:

  • 5G NSA: Relies on the LTE EPC for core network functions.
  • 5G SA: Introduces a new 5GC for native 5G core capabilities.

3.2 Independence:

  • 5G NSA: The 5G NR relies on LTE for certain core functions, creating interdependence.
  • 5G SA: Operates independently, providing a fully standalone architecture.

3.3 Deployment Flexibility:

  • 5G NSA: Allows for a more flexible and incremental deployment leveraging existing LTE infrastructure.
  • 5G SA: Requires a more comprehensive deployment strategy with a full 5G core network.

3.4 Network Slicing:

  • 5G NSA: Supports limited network slicing capabilities.
  • 5G SA: Offers extensive support for network slicing, enabling customized virtualized networks.

3.5 Time to Market:

  • 5G NSA: Faster time to market due to leveraging existing LTE infrastructure.
  • 5G SA: Longer time to market due to the need for a complete standalone architecture.

4. Use Cases:

4.1 5G NSA:

  • Initial deployments targeting enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB).
  • Well-suited for scenarios where rapid deployment is a priority.

4.2 5G SA:

  • Enables a broader range of use cases, including massive machine-type communication (mMTC) and ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC).
  • Ideal for applications with stringent requirements on latency, reliability, and network slicing.

In summary, the choice between 5G NSA and 5G SA depends on factors such as deployment strategy, existing infrastructure, and the specific use cases targeted. 5G NSA provides a faster and more flexible transition, while 5G SA offers a more comprehensive and independent 5G experience with support for advanced use cases. Both deployment options contribute to the evolution of 5G networks to meet the diverse requirements of future communication services.